This study analyzes the current positions on inclusive language in Mexico and Spain’s macro sociopolitical structures that hold far-reaching influence in matters of language ideology. Given the influx of inclusive language manual publications in the last decade, such as the Orientaciones sobre uso no sexista del lenguaje administrativo (Spain, 2007); Manual del lenguaje: Integrador no sexista (Spain, 2013); Manual de comunicación no sexista: Hacia un lenguaje incluyente (Mexico, 2015); Guía para el uso del lenguaje inclusivo desde un enfoque de derechos humanos y perspectiva de género (Mexico, 2017), the study, in part, examines the use of the so-called generic masculine. In addition, the research analyzes legislative initiatives for inclusive language and responses from nationally ranked language institutions, including the Royal Spanish Academy (RAE) and the Mexican Language Academy (ALM) that either support or oppose inclusive language models. This study seeks to unravel the ideologies that support or discourage inclusive language practices based on the recommendations of the language authorities that operate in each of the two countries. The research findings indicate that inclusive language initiatives in both Mexico and Spain have permeated politics and legislation and continue to be highly polemic as government entities and national institutions prescribe the use of certain language structures over others.