Using campaign communications to analyze civility in ranked choice voting elections

Search for this publication on Google Scholar
Kropf, M. (2021). Using campaign communications to analyze civility in ranked choice voting elections. Politics And Governance. https://doi.org/doi:10.17645/pag.v9i2.4293
Download PDF

Analytics

10 views ◎
1 downloads ⇓


Description

Faculty, Theory suggests that ranked choice voting (RCV) may create a more civil campaign environment. As voters must rank candidates, the candidates have an incentive to work with each other more collaboratively. This study uses text analysis software (LIWC) to examine candidate tweets and newspaper articles in RCV versus specifically-chosen plurality cities for evidence of positivity or negativity. In quantitatively comparing the tweets, the results are mixed among the cities. Qualitatively, candidates seem to be more likely to engage each other in RCV cities than in plurality cities. Using LIWC to analyze newspaper articles for campaign tone, one can see that RCV city articles have significantly more positive than negative words. This is the first published study to use direct campaign communication data to study RCV elections and campaign civility. This research validates survey research indicating that citizens perceive RCV campaigns are more civil.

Details
Title

Using campaign communications to analyze civility in ranked choice voting elections

Author(s)

Kropf, Martha

UNC Charlotte Affiliate Type

Faculty

Extent

1 online resource

Date Created

2021

Genre

articles

Resource Type

text

Abstract

Theory suggests that ranked choice voting (RCV) may create a more civil campaign environment. As voters must rank candidates, the candidates have an incentive to work with each other more collaboratively. This study uses text analysis software (LIWC) to examine candidate tweets and newspaper articles in RCV versus specifically-chosen plurality cities for evidence of positivity or negativity. In quantitatively comparing the tweets, the results are mixed among the cities. Qualitatively, candidates seem to be more likely to engage each other in RCV cities than in plurality cities. Using LIWC to analyze newspaper articles for campaign tone, one can see that RCV city articles have significantly more positive than negative words. This is the first published study to use direct campaign communication data to study RCV elections and campaign civility. This research validates survey research indicating that citizens perceive RCV campaigns are more civil.

Subjects--Topics

Preferential ballot
Sentiment analysis

Is Part Of

Politics and governance

Language

English

Published Version (Please cite this version)

doi:10.17645/pag.v9i2.4293

Publisher's Version

https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.4293

Rights

This item may be protected by copyright and other related rights. Atkins Library provides access to this item for educational and research purposes only; other uses require the permission of the copyright holder.