A comparison of web-based and paper-based course evaluations at UNC Charlotte

Search for this publication on Google Scholar
Lambert, R., Hartshorne, R., Algozzine, B., & McAlpin, V. (2013). A comparison of web-based and paper-based course evaluations at UNC Charlotte. Ceme Technical Report.
Download PDF

Analytics

59 views ◎
20 downloads ⇓


Description

Faculty, Based on extant research, UNC Charlotte should consider the adoption of a university-wide, web-based course evaluation system for both formative and summative evaluations: Ratings Similarity: Web and paper results show students very favorable towards instruction at UNC Charlotte. The results show no practical difference in ratings between survey methods and that open-ended responses are generally more complete in web surveys. Availability of Results: Detailed web-based evaluation results are immediately available; this is a sharp contrast with the current system, where faculties wait for weeks or even months for results. Data Reporting: A web-based course evaluation system provides opportunities for comparison of data across colleges, departments, and disciplines, thereby contributing to strategic planning and institutional research. Response Rates: Prior studies show response rates in pilot tests of web-based course evaluations are typically lower than paper-based equivalents, but these rates rise when the web-based evaluations are centralized and fully operational with standard procedures in place. UNC Charlotte’s pilot response rates significantly exceeded those in prior studies.

Details
Title

A comparison of web-based and paper-based course evaluations at UNC Charlotte

Author(s)

Lambert, Richard
Hartshorne, Richard
Algozzine, Bob
McAlpin, Valorie

UNC Charlotte Affiliate Type

Faculty

Extent

1 online resource

Date Published

2013

Genre

technical reports

Resource Type

text

Abstract

Based on extant research, UNC Charlotte should consider the adoption of a university-wide, web-based course evaluation system for both formative and summative evaluations: Ratings Similarity: Web and paper results show students very favorable towards instruction at UNC Charlotte. The results show no practical difference in ratings between survey methods and that open-ended responses are generally more complete in web surveys. Availability of Results: Detailed web-based evaluation results are immediately available; this is a sharp contrast with the current system, where faculties wait for weeks or even months for results. Data Reporting: A web-based course evaluation system provides opportunities for comparison of data across colleges, departments, and disciplines, thereby contributing to strategic planning and institutional research. Response Rates: Prior studies show response rates in pilot tests of web-based course evaluations are typically lower than paper-based equivalents, but these rates rise when the web-based evaluations are centralized and fully operational with standard procedures in place. UNC Charlotte’s pilot response rates significantly exceeded those in prior studies.

Subjects--Topics

Educational evaluation
Education, Higher

Is Part Of

CEME technical report

Language

English

Publisher's Version

https://ceme.charlotte.edu/sites/ceme.charlotte.edu/files/media/pdfs/Web...

Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13093/work:795

Rights

This item may be protected by copyright and other related rights. Atkins Library provides access to this item for educational and research purposes only; other uses require the permission of the copyright holder.