The Effectiveness of Charismatic Signaling by Gender: A Prospective Meta-Analytic Review

Search for this publication on Google Scholar
Hausfeld, M. (2023). The Effectiveness of Charismatic Signaling by Gender: A Prospective Meta-Analytic Review. Unc Charlotte Electronic Theses And Dissertations.
Download PDF

Analytics

51 views ◎
10 downloads ⇓


Abstract

While charismatic leadership tactics (CLTs) have been validated across a variety of settings and shown to improve leader evaluations and cause follower behaviors, the role gender may play in charismatic leadership has been understudied. The present investigation assesses the influence of leader gender as well as a host of contextual variables on the efficacy of CLTs in influencing follower evaluations of leaders as well as follower prosocial behavior (i.e., financial donations). Using signaling theory, the current work examines critical moderators of the charismatic effect and integrates gender as a signal that may influence the efficacy of charismatic signaling. Through a set of independent experimental studies, which I conducted and then meta-analyzed (k = 8; n = 1,002), this paper identifies that the relationships between charismatic signaling, leader gender, and contextual moderators are nuanced and complex. I found a moderate main effect for charisma such that charismatic signaling did result in more positive follower evaluations (d = .20, 95% CI = [.11 to .30]) and increased prosocial donation behavior (d = .13, 95% CI = [.07 to .19]) but the meta-analytic results revealed an interaction, such that these effects were often stronger for women than for men (e.g., attributed charisma d = .27, 95% CI = [.15 to .39] for women, compared to d = .13, 95% CI = [.01 to .26] for men). Furthermore, I found a main effect of gender for influence (d = .16, 95% CI = [.06 to .25]) and donation behavior (d = .11, 95% CI = [.05 to .18]) favoring women, but this gender difference was reduced or disappeared entirely when the leader engaged in costly signaling behavior (influence d = .08, 95% CI = [-.04 to .21]) or held only informal authority (influence d = .11, 95% CI = [-.06 to .29]). Future directions and the need for a more nuanced theory of charismatic signaling are discussed.

Details
Author

Hausfeld, Mary

Title

The Effectiveness of Charismatic Signaling by Gender: A Prospective Meta-Analytic Review

Physical Description

1 online resource (108 pages) : PDF

Date

2023

Degree Granting Institution

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Abstract

While charismatic leadership tactics (CLTs) have been validated across a variety of settings and shown to improve leader evaluations and cause follower behaviors, the role gender may play in charismatic leadership has been understudied. The present investigation assesses the influence of leader gender as well as a host of contextual variables on the efficacy of CLTs in influencing follower evaluations of leaders as well as follower prosocial behavior (i.e., financial donations). Using signaling theory, the current work examines critical moderators of the charismatic effect and integrates gender as a signal that may influence the efficacy of charismatic signaling. Through a set of independent experimental studies, which I conducted and then meta-analyzed (k = 8; n = 1,002), this paper identifies that the relationships between charismatic signaling, leader gender, and contextual moderators are nuanced and complex. I found a moderate main effect for charisma such that charismatic signaling did result in more positive follower evaluations (d = .20, 95% CI = [.11 to .30]) and increased prosocial donation behavior (d = .13, 95% CI = [.07 to .19]) but the meta-analytic results revealed an interaction, such that these effects were often stronger for women than for men (e.g., attributed charisma d = .27, 95% CI = [.15 to .39] for women, compared to d = .13, 95% CI = [.01 to .26] for men). Furthermore, I found a main effect of gender for influence (d = .16, 95% CI = [.06 to .25]) and donation behavior (d = .11, 95% CI = [.05 to .18]) favoring women, but this gender difference was reduced or disappeared entirely when the leader engaged in costly signaling behavior (influence d = .08, 95% CI = [-.04 to .21]) or held only informal authority (influence d = .11, 95% CI = [-.06 to .29]). Future directions and the need for a more nuanced theory of charismatic signaling are discussed.

Genre

doctoral dissertations

Subjects--Topics

Management

Degree

Ph.D.

Keywords

Charisma
Charismatic Leadership
Gender
Leadership

Subject Area

Organizational Science

Advisor(s)

Banks, George

Committee Members

Heggestad, Eric
Yavorsky, Jill
Tonidandel, Scott

Degree Note

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 2023.

Rights Statement

This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). For additional information, see http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/.

Rights Holder Information

Copyright is held by the author unless otherwise indicated.

Identifier

Hausfeld_uncc_0694D_13293

Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13093/etd:3179