Looking at the Positive: The Stress-Buffering Role of Cognitive Reappraisal Ability on Risk Factors for Disease

Search for this publication on Google Scholar
Sagui, S. (2015). Looking at the Positive: The Stress-Buffering Role of Cognitive Reappraisal Ability on Risk Factors for Disease. Unc Charlotte Electronic Theses And Dissertations.
Download PDF

Analytics

71 views ◎
43 downloads ⇓


Abstract

Stress contributes to poor health outcomes; importantly, a stress reaction begins with the negative appraisal of a situation. The ability to use cognitive reappraisal, an emotion regulation strategy that involves reinterpreting an initial appraisal to change its emotional impact, could be a protective factor against the health consequences of stress reactivity. The present study investigated (1) if cognitive reappraisal ability acts as a stress-buffer against high body mass index (BMI) and (2) if this buffering effect persists against the indirect influences of stress reactivity on type 2 diabetes. Participants completed an online cognitive reappraisal ability (CRA) task, self-report measures of perceived stress reactivity, height, weight, and type 2 diabetes diagnosis. Results revealed that CRA significantly interacted with perceived stress reactivity to predict BMI, which indirectly predicted type 2 diabetes. Individuals who perceived elevated levels of stress reactivity yet had higher CRA, exhibited lower BMI and lower incidence of type 2 diabetes than individuals with higher perceived stress reactivity and lower CRA. Interestingly, higher CRA appeared to not be protective in those who have lower levels of perceived stress reactivity. Findings from this study suggest that emotion regulation interventions can be developed to indirectly target type 2 diabetes and similar obesity-related illnesses and must be designed according to the individual given the context-dependent nature of our results.

Details
Author

Sagui, Sara

Title

Looking at the Positive: The Stress-Buffering Role of Cognitive Reappraisal Ability on Risk Factors for Disease

Physical Description

1 online resource (57 pages) : PDF

Date

2015

Degree Granting Institution

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Abstract

Stress contributes to poor health outcomes; importantly, a stress reaction begins with the negative appraisal of a situation. The ability to use cognitive reappraisal, an emotion regulation strategy that involves reinterpreting an initial appraisal to change its emotional impact, could be a protective factor against the health consequences of stress reactivity. The present study investigated (1) if cognitive reappraisal ability acts as a stress-buffer against high body mass index (BMI) and (2) if this buffering effect persists against the indirect influences of stress reactivity on type 2 diabetes. Participants completed an online cognitive reappraisal ability (CRA) task, self-report measures of perceived stress reactivity, height, weight, and type 2 diabetes diagnosis. Results revealed that CRA significantly interacted with perceived stress reactivity to predict BMI, which indirectly predicted type 2 diabetes. Individuals who perceived elevated levels of stress reactivity yet had higher CRA, exhibited lower BMI and lower incidence of type 2 diabetes than individuals with higher perceived stress reactivity and lower CRA. Interestingly, higher CRA appeared to not be protective in those who have lower levels of perceived stress reactivity. Findings from this study suggest that emotion regulation interventions can be developed to indirectly target type 2 diabetes and similar obesity-related illnesses and must be designed according to the individual given the context-dependent nature of our results.

Genre

masters theses

Subjects--Topics

Psychology
Medical sciences

Degree

M.A.

Keywords

Body Mass Index
Cognitive Reappraisal
Emotion Regulation
Health Behavior
Perceived Stress Reactivity
Type 2 Diabetes

Subject Area

Psychology

Advisor(s)

Levens, Sara

Committee Members

Reeve, Charlie
Bennett, Jeanette
Johnson, Susan
Turner, Michael

Degree Note

Thesis (M.A.)--University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 2015.

Rights Statement

This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). For additional information, see http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/.

Rights Holder Information

Copyright is held by the author unless otherwise indicated.

Identifier

Sagui_uncc_0694N_11000

Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13093/etd:289