Transit Riders and Access to Bus Service: A Neighborhood Analysis

1 online resource (153 pages) : PDF

2009

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Intra-jurisdictional delivery of publicly provided services often results in observable differences in service levels that vary by spatial subunit (neighborhood). These variations are related to the socio-demographic characteristics of neighborhoods and have been hypothesized in prior literature to be the result of bias against or favoritism towards certain neighborhoods. Using a mixed-method approach, this dissertation examines publicly provided bus service in four cities - Asheville, NC, Charlotte, NC, Mobile, AL, and Richmond, VA - to examine whether the socio-economic character of a neighborhood is related to the share of municipal bus service it receives and if distribution of shares is impacted by politicized decision-making in the public bureaucracy. Specifically, do transit-dependent neighborhoods, or those with a high percentage of non-Caucasian, low-income, elderly, or student residents receive inferior bus service? Findings confirm prior research that both professional norms and bias are present in service delivery decisions in all four cities. Bias toward upper-income neighborhoods is found in all four cities as well as bias against non-Caucasian neighborhoods in two of the four cities. Additionally, in cities with unreformed government structure, service delivery decisions may be politicized.

doctoral dissertations

City planning
Public administration
Transportation--Planning

Ph.D.

Access
Bias
Bureaucracy
Bus
Transit-Dependent

Public Policy

Thill, Jean-Claude

Leland, Suzanne
Hauser, Edd
Pulugurtha, Srinivas

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 2009.

This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). For additional information, see http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/.

Copyright is held by the author unless otherwise indicated.

Wells_uncc_0694D_10057

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13093/etd:1745