CURRENT GRADING PRACTICES OF SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS IN THE CORE CONTENT AREAS: WHAT DO GRADES MEAN?

Search for this publication on Google Scholar
McLean, N. (2018). CURRENT GRADING PRACTICES OF SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS IN THE CORE CONTENT AREAS: WHAT DO GRADES MEAN?. Unc Charlotte Electronic Theses And Dissertations.
Download PDF

Analytics

148 views ◎
130 downloads ⇓


Abstract

Using survey research methodology, the study investigates assessment and grading practices of secondary school teachers. A total of 248 teachers in the Piedmont and coastal regions of North Carolina completed a web-based survey examining academic and nonacademic factors that impacted the final grades of their students and assessment types used in the classroom. The results suggested that the grades teachers assigned are a conglomerate of various factors and mainly use achievement but also incorporate non-achievement factors. The most used factors to determine student grades were: percent correct, use of zeros, objective mastery, academic performance, effort, homework completion, the adjustment of borderline grades, homework quality, the degree that a student pays attention or participates, and improvement since the beginning of the year. The most prevalent assessment type was summative assessments with objective questions created by the teacher. While teachers agreed that the grades assigned by teachers across the state of North Carolina are inflated and contribute to the continually increasing graduation rate, most teachers also believe their grades represent achievement, as opposed to any other factors. There were differences found between core content teachers in the factors used to assign final grades, with math teachers less likely to use objective mastery and homework completion. Implications for school leaders and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Details
Author

McLean, Nathan

Title

CURRENT GRADING PRACTICES OF SECONDARY SCHOOL TEACHERS IN THE CORE CONTENT AREAS: WHAT DO GRADES MEAN?

Physical Description

1 online resource (155 pages) : PDF

Date

2018

Degree Granting Institution

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Abstract

Using survey research methodology, the study investigates assessment and grading practices of secondary school teachers. A total of 248 teachers in the Piedmont and coastal regions of North Carolina completed a web-based survey examining academic and nonacademic factors that impacted the final grades of their students and assessment types used in the classroom. The results suggested that the grades teachers assigned are a conglomerate of various factors and mainly use achievement but also incorporate non-achievement factors. The most used factors to determine student grades were: percent correct, use of zeros, objective mastery, academic performance, effort, homework completion, the adjustment of borderline grades, homework quality, the degree that a student pays attention or participates, and improvement since the beginning of the year. The most prevalent assessment type was summative assessments with objective questions created by the teacher. While teachers agreed that the grades assigned by teachers across the state of North Carolina are inflated and contribute to the continually increasing graduation rate, most teachers also believe their grades represent achievement, as opposed to any other factors. There were differences found between core content teachers in the factors used to assign final grades, with math teachers less likely to use objective mastery and homework completion. Implications for school leaders and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Genre

doctoral dissertations

Subjects--Topics

Education
Education, Secondary

Degree

D.Ed.

Keywords

Assessment
Grades
Grading
Grading Practices
Secondary

Subject Area

Educational Leadership

Advisor(s)

Flowers, Claudia
Watson, Jim

Committee Members

Morris, Debra
Pilonieta, Paola

Degree Note

Thesis (D.Ed.)--University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 2018.

Rights Statement

This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). For additional information, see http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/.

Rights Holder Information

Copyright is held by the author unless otherwise indicated.

Identifier

McLean_uncc_0694D_11880

Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13093/etd:1712