The Effects of Space and Scale on Beta Convergence Testing in the United States, 1970-2004

1 online resource (191 pages) : PDF

2012

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Convergence theory stems from neo-classical growth theory and hypothesizes that regional incomes will converge over time. Beta convergence, the idea that regions of initial poverty will grow faster than regions of initial wealth, has received a great deal of study and yields mixed results. Typically beta convergence is tested in an OLS regression with income changed regressed against initial income levels. From the geographic perspective, possible reasons for mixed convergence test results are the impacts that aggregation size and spatial effects can have on model performance. Interestingly, the potential impacts of these problems are relatively unexplored in the convergence literature. This dissertation fills that void through an examination of convergence in the United States from 1970-2004 at three levels of aggregations: states, Economic Areas, and counties. First an Exploratory Spatial Data Analysis is conducted in order to determine the magnitude and extent of spatial dependence in the convergence variables. Next, OLS, first order, and second order spatial models are run testing for unconditional and conditional convergence. Results indicate that spatial dependence is a problem in convergence models at all scales, and a spatial model must be used. First order spatial models out- perform second order spatial models. Regression results indicate convergence evidence to be strongest at the smaller levels of aggregation, though model fit tends to be better at larger levels. In the end, the functional Economic Area geography proves to be the most stable unit of aggregation for convergence analysis.

doctoral dissertations

Geography

Ph.D.

Convergence
Economic Development
Spatial Statistics

Geography & Urban Regional Analysis

Campbell, Harrison

Graves, William
Swindell, David
Sell, Susan

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 2012.

This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). For additional information, see http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/.

Copyright is held by the author unless otherwise indicated.

James_uncc_0694D_10279

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13093/etd:1546