The Validity of the Achievement-Orientation Model for Gifted Middle School Students

Search for this publication on Google Scholar
Ritchotte, J. (2013). The Validity of the Achievement-Orientation Model for Gifted Middle School Students. Unc Charlotte Electronic Theses And Dissertations.
Download PDF

Analytics

168 views ◎
137 downloads ⇓


Abstract

Gifted underachievement represents a frustrating loss of potential for society. Although attempts have been made to develop interventions to reverse gifted underachievement, the theoretical underpinnings of these interventions have yet to be empirically validated. The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of the Achievement-Orientation Model for gifted middle school students. Based on a sample of 156 gifted sixth and seventh grade mathematics students, results of the current study suggest two unique clusters of gifted students, those whose attitudes toward each of the constructs present in the Achievement-Orientation Model are positive and those who attitudes are negative. Significantly more gifted underachievers were found in the negative attitudes cluster and more gifted achievers in the positive attitudes cluster, χ2(1)= 15.86, p<.001. Further, only two of the constructs present in the model distinguished gifted achievers from gifted underachievers, self-efficacy, t(154)=-3.850, p<.001, d=.62 and self-regulation, t(154)=-3.113, p=.002, d=.50. Finally, results of a path analysis call into question several of the relationships specified by the model. In particular, task meaningfulness only predicted student engagement and was not significantly related to self-regulation or student achievement. The findings of this study suggest the Achievement-Orientation Model may hold promise for the development of interventions to address gifted underachievement; however, future research should be conducted to continue work toward validating the model before this step is taken.

Details
Author

Ritchotte, Jennifer

Title

The Validity of the Achievement-Orientation Model for Gifted Middle School Students

Physical Description

1 online resource (143 pages) : PDF

Date

2013

Degree Granting Institution

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Abstract

Gifted underachievement represents a frustrating loss of potential for society. Although attempts have been made to develop interventions to reverse gifted underachievement, the theoretical underpinnings of these interventions have yet to be empirically validated. The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of the Achievement-Orientation Model for gifted middle school students. Based on a sample of 156 gifted sixth and seventh grade mathematics students, results of the current study suggest two unique clusters of gifted students, those whose attitudes toward each of the constructs present in the Achievement-Orientation Model are positive and those who attitudes are negative. Significantly more gifted underachievers were found in the negative attitudes cluster and more gifted achievers in the positive attitudes cluster, χ2(1)= 15.86, p<.001. Further, only two of the constructs present in the model distinguished gifted achievers from gifted underachievers, self-efficacy, t(154)=-3.850, p<.001, d=.62 and self-regulation, t(154)=-3.113, p=.002, d=.50. Finally, results of a path analysis call into question several of the relationships specified by the model. In particular, task meaningfulness only predicted student engagement and was not significantly related to self-regulation or student achievement. The findings of this study suggest the Achievement-Orientation Model may hold promise for the development of interventions to address gifted underachievement; however, future research should be conducted to continue work toward validating the model before this step is taken.

Genre

doctoral dissertations

Subjects--Topics

Gifted children--Education

Degree

Ph.D.

Keywords

Achievement-Orientation Model
Gifted
Middle School
Underachievement

Subject Area

Special Education

Advisor(s)

Flowers, Claudia

Committee Members

Anderson, Kelly
Jones, Jeanneine
Romanoff, Brenda
Pilonieta, Paola

Degree Note

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 2013.

Rights Statement

This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). For additional information, see http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/.

Rights Holder Information

Copyright is held by the author unless otherwise indicated.

Identifier

Ritchotte_uncc_0694D_10412

Permalink

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13093/etd:1192