The relative effects of habitat amount, habitat configuration, and urbanization intensity on forest breeding birds

1 online resource (66 pages) : PDF

2016

University of North Carolina at Charlotte

It is clear that urbanization causes changes in landscape structure that adversely affect biodiversity. However, the relative impacts of different components of landscape structure remain unclear. Using the 2006 National Land Cover Database and 2010 U.S. Census data, I quantified habitat amount, habitat configuration, and matrix quality in concentric landscapes of ten different radii (ranging from 0.2km to 16km) centered on forested point counts spanning the state of Pennsylvania in order to distinguish the independent impacts of these three aspects of landscape structure. I estimated forest bird abundance, species richness, species evenness, and American robin and Scarlet tanager occurrence from a large and spatially-extensive dataset of point counts collected during the 2nd Pennsylvania Breeding Bird Atlas conducted 2004-2009. I used generalized linear modeling and a multi-model inference approach to determine the relative effects of these three aspects of landscape structure in Pennsylvania landscapes on avian biodiversity in remnant forest. Of the three elements of landscape structure investigated, matrix quality was the most influential predictor of diversity and species occurrence. This research suggests that modifications to the urban and agricultural matrix surrounding forest patches will have more influence on forest birds than attempts to alter forest amount or configuration. These results are expected to be of particular interest to land managers given the emergent intensity of the Marcellus shale gas industry and its impacts on landscape structure in Pennsylvania landscapes.

masters theses

Ecology
Conservation biology

M.S.

Forest Birds
Multi-Model Inference
Multi-Scale
Pennsylvania
Relative Importance of Predictors
Urbanization

Earth Sciences

Gagné, Sara
Wilson, Andrew

Tang, Wenwu
Xiang, Wei-Ning

Thesis (M.S.)--University of North Carolina at Charlotte, 2016.

This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). For additional information, see http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/.

Copyright is held by the author unless otherwise indicated.

Shoffner_uncc_0694N_11083

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13093/etd:1135